Appellant builder treated Property as stock-in-trade & profits on its sale would be offered as business income and no rental income was received by Appellant from Property.
ITAT Pune held that as NFAC dismissed the claim of deduction u/s 80P on legal issue without considering the case on merits, matter remanded back for fresh adjudication.
The issue in the present appeal relates to the exigibility of penalty u/s 271B for failure of the assessee to get accounts audited in respect of the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration as required u/s 44AB and furnished to the Assessing Officer before specified due date i.e. due date for filing the return of income.
Chandrakant Tatoba Patil Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT noted that on an examination of the assessment record, the PCIT found abnormal increase in cash deposits during demonetization period as compared to pre-demonetization period. According to the PCIT, during the period from 09-11-2016 to 31-12-2016, the assessee deposited cash amounting to Rs.1,43,81,225/- which is inclusive of […]
ITAT Pune held that as receipts from business activity is more than 20% of the total receipts, character of charitable purpose as given in section 2(15) will be lost and accordingly, exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act not available.
Kritija Construction Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The issue in the present appeal relates to the taxability of difference of amounts shown in the Form No. 26AS and reflected in the Profit & Loss Account. It is an admitted fact that in the present case the appellant firm had received advance of Rs.38,88,745/- from one Siddhashila […]
When donations forming corpus of assessee’s trust received with specific purpose are capital in nature. ITAT held that corpus specific voluntary donations are not taxable in case of unregistered trust
ITAT Pune held that interest granted by the reference Court u/s. 28 of the Land Acquisition Act from the date of possession of land till the date of judgment of High Court is an accretion of the value of the land acquired and accordingly not taxable.
ITAT Pune held that provisions of section 54B of the Income Tax Act being an exemption provision needs to be interpreted strictly. Accordingly, as land revenue record clinches that agricultural activity is not carried out on the impugned land, deduction u/s 54B not available.
ITAT Pune held that claim for exemption of income under section 11 of the Income Tax Act deniable as Form No. 10B was not submitted along with the return of income nor it was submitted before processing of return of income.
