Sponsored
    Follow Us:

NCLAT

NCLAT cannot enter into commercial wisdom of COC & disturb business decision

February 28, 2020 2784 Views 0 comment Print

Pacific World Shipping PTE Ltd. Vs Dadi Impex Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT) The main grievance of the Appellant is that the Operational Creditors have been given only token 2% of their claims admitted while the Financial Creditors are given 100% of their claims. The learned Counsel for the Bank has then relied on Regulation 37 of […]

NCLAT : Defaulting company liable to repay FDR amount alongwith interest to its deposit holders

February 25, 2020 3825 Views 1 comment Print

Following the principle of justice and equity, the defaulting company “Unitech” was liable to repay the amount to its deposit holders principal along with the future interest @12.5% per annum from the date of maturity of the respective FDR till receipt thereof alongwith Rs.50000/- each to assessees towards cost of litigation, costs etc

NCLAT releases Flipkart India from Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)

February 24, 2020 2007 Views 0 comment Print

Neeraj Jain Vs Cloudwalker Streaming Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT) we have found that demand notice delivered under Section 8(1) of the Code was not proper and was also incomplete. The Operational Creditor failed to submit any documents to prove in existence of the Operational debt and the amount in The Operational Creditor also failed to […]

NCLAT allows Liquidator to hand over records, control etc. to Liberty House Group

February 17, 2020 1554 Views 0 comment Print

Liberty House Group Pte. Ltd. Vs State Bank of India & Ors. (NCLAT Delhi) Mr. Virendra Ganda, learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant(s) submits that the amount in terms of the earlier order dated 21st January, 2020 has been paid. Mr. Joy Saha, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of ‘Committee of Creditors’ has also […]

Difference between ‘Adjudicating Authorities’ & ‘Court’: NCLAT clarifies

February 4, 2020 6036 Views 0 comment Print

Adjudicating Authorities cannot possess the power to direct the Central Government to conduct/order the investigation against any company. Taking a look at Section 210(3) of the Act, it is clear that the Central Government ought to conduct an investigation into the affairs of the Company by appointing an inspector and obtain his report thereof and then after scrutinizing the said report, the Government can approach the SFIO department regarding the same

Tax Authorities crying foul in Reliance Jio Demerger Deal

December 20, 2019 7620 Views 0 comment Print

Facts of the Case Reliance Jio Infocom Limited (‘Reliance Jio’) is a Public Limited Company registered under Companies Act 2013. It is an Indian Telecommunication Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance Industries, headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. It operates a national LTE network with coverage across all 22 telecom circles. Reliance Jio filed a […]

Cyrus mistry won case against tata sons in NCLAT

December 18, 2019 4395 Views 0 comment Print

The proceedings of the sixth meeting of the Board of Directors of ‘Tata Sons Limited’ held on Monday, 24th October, 2016 so far as it relates to removal and other actions taken against Mr. Cyrus Pallonji Mistry (11th Respondent) is declared illegal and is set aside.

Position of Amalgamation of Indian LLP Under Companies Act 2013

December 4, 2019 2655 Views 0 comment Print

Regional Director Vs Real Image LLP (NCLAT) Our Today’s article is about the Basic question that if an Indian LLP wants to process for the Amalgamation into a Indian Company, whether it required to obtain the registration under section 366 In the case of Regional Director, Southern Region, & Ors.  V. Real Images LLP. If […]

Single member cannot pass order on matter heard by two Members: NCLAT

October 25, 2019 1320 Views 0 comment Print

The order of ‘admission’ is challenged on the ground that the matter having been heard by two Hon’ble Members and the final order could not have been passed by Hon’ble Member (Judicial).

Promoter not eligible to file application for Compromise and Arrangement, while he is ineligible U/s. 29A of I&B Code to submit a ‘Resolution Plan’

October 24, 2019 2052 Views 0 comment Print

Promoter, if ineligible under Section 29A cannot make an application for Compromise and Arrangement for taking back the immovable and movable property or actionable claims of the ‘Corporate Debtor’.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31