Applicant No. 1 alleged that the Respondent has not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price on purchase of Apartment No. 503, Tower-E, from the Respondent in the Project Panchshil Towers situated at Kharadi, Pune on the introduction of GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017, in terms of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Dr. Rahul Bamal Vs SVP Builders India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the case was that an application was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules. 2017, by the Applicant no. 1, wherein it had been alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit […]
Director-General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Friends Land Developers (NAA) The present Report dated 01.07.2020 has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that this Authority, vide Order No. 62/2019 dated 27.11.2019, […]
NAA held that distributor of products manufactured by others also liable to pass on the benefit of tax rate reduction to the recipients
Meenal Gupta Vs Kanakia Spaces Reality Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The present Report dated 31.08.2020 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rue 129 (8) of the Coning Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 In pursuance of Authority’s Interim Order no.15/2019 dated 19.11 […]
Milan Pankaj Kothari Vs Sri Dutt Constructions (NAA) The brief facts of the present case are that an application was filed before the Maharashtra State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of a Flat No. […]
Applicant alleged that JM Lingamaneni Township not passed ITC benefit of by way of reduction in price in respect of project ‘Raintree Park’.
Saurabh Kumar Vs Pareena Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Applicant alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit or Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price of flat in respect of purchase of flat in project “Laxmi Apartment” Sector-99A, Dwarka Expressway, Gurugram, Haryana. It is clear from […]
Mahendra Kishanlal Prajapati Vs Vishwanath Builders (NAA) The Authority finds that the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit of 3.75% of the turnover has accrued to the Respondent for the project ‘Sarathya’. This benefit was required to be passed on to the recipients. Thus, Section 171 of the CGST, 2017 has been contravened by the […]
Sunil Saraf Vs Paramount Propbuild Pvt Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the present case was that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering to the DGAP for conducting a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase […]
