Lucknow Development Authority allegedly not passed on benefit of ITC to in project Kritika & Swati Apartment situated at Chak, Gaj aria, Lucknow on introduction of GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017
Smt. Rekha Gamaprasad Yadav Vs Rushi Builder and Developers (NAA) The Present Report dated 23.09.2021 had been received in National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA or Authority) from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 128 of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, on […]
Damodar Ropeways & Infra Limited Vs Salarpuria Signum Complex LLP (NAA) It is observed from the DGAP’s report that the ITC, as a percentage of the turnover, that was available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period (April-2016 to June-2017) was 5.07%, whereas, during the post-GST period (July-2017 to September, 2020), it was 5.60% for […]
Applicant No. 1 had filed an application before the Andhra Pradesh State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules,2017 and alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of the input tax credit by way of commensurate reduction in price
Vijay Pal Sing Vs Nandi Infratech Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Authority determines an amount or Rs. 7,28,05,691/- (including 12% GST) under section 133(1) as the profiteered amount by the Respondent from his 768 home buyers/shop buyers/customers which shall be refunded by him along with interest @18% thereon, from the date when the above amount was […]
Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering in respect of DTH (Direct to flume) Service supplied by the Respondent vide subscription ID No. 1088222136 in respect of payment of half yearly/annual subscription charges.
Applicant No. 1 alleged that the Respondent has not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price on purchase of Apartment No. 503, Tower-E, from the Respondent in the Project Panchshil Towers situated at Kharadi, Pune on the introduction of GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017, in terms of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Dr. Rahul Bamal Vs SVP Builders India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the case was that an application was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules. 2017, by the Applicant no. 1, wherein it had been alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit […]
Director-General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Friends Land Developers (NAA) The present Report dated 01.07.2020 has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that this Authority, vide Order No. 62/2019 dated 27.11.2019, […]
NAA held that distributor of products manufactured by others also liable to pass on the benefit of tax rate reduction to the recipients
