Parvez Khan Vs Pearlite Real Properties Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Facts of the Case: The brief facts of the present case are that an application dated 15.10.2018 was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1, alleging profiteering […]
Sumit Mansingka Vs E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Facts of the case: The brief facts of the present case are that a complaint dated 18.12.2017 was filed before the Uttar Pradesh State level Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering by the Applicant No.1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of a flat in the Respondent’s […]
Rahul Gautam Vs Himalaya Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Facts of the Case: The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application dated 16.10.2018 before the Haryana State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and submitted that […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs L’Oreal India Pvt. Ltd (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) Facts of the Case: The brief facts of the case are that it was alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of reduction in the rate of GST on the Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCGs) being supplied by him, when […]
Sh. Bhanja Kishore Pradhan Vs HCBS Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) Facts of the Case: The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 filed application, dated 19.09.2018, before the National Anti-profiteering Authority under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The said application was forwarded by the […]
Ajay Kumar Vs Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. (NAA) Facts of the Case: The brief facts of the case are that vide their applications dated 09.10.2018 and 16.12.2019 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 and 2 had alleged profiteering by the Respondent […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs ITC Ltd (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) Facts of the Case: The brief facts of the case are that the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering vide its communication dated 14.09.2018 had requested the DGAP to conduct detailed investigation as per Rule 129 (1) of the above Rules on the allegation that the Respondent […]
Susheel Prasad Todi Vs Acme Housing India Pvt Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) In this case It is established that the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have been contravened by the builder as he has profiteered an amount of Rs. 2,10,57,462/- which includes 12% GST on the base profiteered amount of Rs. […]
Rule 42 of the CGST Rules, 2017 lays down the mode of computation of mandatory reversal of the unutilized input tax credits in respect of unsold flats/shops of a real estate project at the time of receipt of completion Certificate (CC)/ occupancy certificate (OC) or on the date of first occupancy, whichever is earlier.
Kishore Arjandas Udasi Vs Wheelabrator Alloy Castings Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Facts of the Case: The brief facts of the case are that vide his application dated 09.08.2018 filed before the Maharashtra State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respondent […]
