Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Elan Ltd. (NAA) The Authority has carefully examined the Report of the DGAP and it has been observed that the relevant events for the project Epic took place in GST regime and the Respondent had not availed any CENVAT/ITC, related to ‘EPIC’ project, in pre-GST regime and that the Respondent […]
Director-General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Dange Enterprises (NAA) Authority also find that after the closure of the hearing, Respondent vide his email dated 13.06.2022 has stated that he has agreed to submit the requisite data in the prescribed format as required by the DGAP for the entire period of investigation. In the given situation, as narrated […]
Sh. Deepak Naik Vs Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. (NAA) Authority funds that the Respondent has gained the benefit of ITC on the supply of Construction Services after the implementation of GST w.e.f 01.07.2017 and the Respondent was required to pass on such benefit of ITC to the homebuyers/customers by way of commensurate reduction in prices […]
Anti-Profiteering Provisions of Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 violated by Respondent, yet provisions of IBC, 2016 will nonetheless prevail.
Varun Goel Vs Town Park Buildcon Private Ltd. (NAA) a. The Respondent vide his submissions dated 05.04.2022 has contended that the DGAP has not incorporated the ITC of VAT in the pre-GST period for the computation of profiteering which ought to have been done. He has further submitted before this Authority that the said ITC […]
NAA held that ITC benefit of Rs. 16,49,897/- was required to be passed on to 39 flat buyers by SSBC Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.
Nilang Shastri Vs Swati Realty (NAA) Applicant alleged profiteering by Respondent Swati Realty in respect of purchase of a Flat in the Respondent’s project –Swati Florence, Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The Applicant has alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in price after the implementation […]
Since the registration was obtained for the subject projects post the introduction of Goods and Services Tax only, the provisions of Section 171 dealing with Anti-profiteering could not be made applicable to the said projects in the view of the fact that there was no additional ITC that had been made available to the Respondent,
NAA held that Jay Cee Chemists did not pass on the benefit of exemption of GST on Sanitary Napkin’s amounting to Rs. 2048 to Customers.
Rajeev Goyal Vs Prateek Infra Projects India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Authority finds that the Applicant No. 1 has alleged fraud and forgery on the part of the Respondent and fault in calculations of the profiteered amount, saleable area and the total turnover of the Respondent by the DGAP for the Project Prateek Edifice. The […]
