Accordingly, the interest on deposits would qualify for deduction under the said section. Appellant Cooperative society is entitled for deduction u/s 80P as claimed in the return.
ITAT Nagpur held that once the computation of income is approved by the assessee before CIT(A) the same cannot be argued against the Tribunal. Accordingly, computation of income directed by CIT(A) upheld.
ITAT Nagpur held that once the return of income has been filed belatedly, no benefit under section 80IA of the Income Tax Act is allowed. Accordingly, deduction u/s. 80IA disallowed.
Appellant contended that since he had filed income tax returns under section 44AD of the Act, which does not require maintenance of books of account, section 69A was not applicable.
The case of Beantkaur Avtarsingh Juneja versus ITO, Nagpur, has sparked significant debate regarding recoverability of income tax penalties from legal representatives of deceased individuals accused of tax offenses.
Royal Drinks Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Nagpur) Interest liability incurred against delayed discharge of statutory liability/MVAT is entitled for deduction u/s 37(1) without subjecting it to disallowance u/s 43B(a)
Nagpur ITAT reaffirms that ITR claims not in resolution plans are extinguished upon approval, guiding taxpayers through corporate insolvency proceedings.
Explore the case of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs. DIT where penalty under Section 271FA for non-filing of AIR was deleted due to reasonable cause.
An examination of section 271AAB penalty when no undisclosed income is found during search actions. Discover how ITAT Nagpur ruled on this critical tax law issue.
ITAT Nagpur held that the assessee is undoubtedly entitled to hold two different portfolios in respect of the same kind of asset i.e. stock in trade and investment. Since, the land was held as investment the same is assessable to tax under the head ‘capital gain’.
