Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order in the case of Nikhil Suryakant Shah vs ITO. The ITAT has deleted the addition for deemed interest on a loan given by the director to the company. Get the analysis and conclusion here.
ITAT Mumbai held that deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act is duly available to co-operative society on the interest income/dividend received/earned from deposits with the co-operative banks.
ITAT Mumbai held that the assessee is eligible to claim exemption u/s. 54 of the Income Tax Act as the construction of residential house completed within three years from the relevant date.
ITAT Mumbai held that membership fee expenses have been incurred for acquisition of individual club membership is not allowable as expenditure in terms of provisions of section 37 of the Income Tax Act.ITAT Mumbai held that membership fee expenses have been incurred for acquisition of individual club membership is not allowable as expenditure in terms of provisions of section 37 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition on account of mismatch between the income reported under form number 26AS and the income recorded in the books of accounts unsustainable since the mis-match duly explained.
ITAT Mumbai remanded the matter to jurisdictional AO for de novo adjudication since the assessee was not able to furnish the documents at the time of assessment proceedings and the documents furnished before CIT(A) were not considered/ verified.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favour of Anant Singhania HUF, allowing TDS credit for sale of housing property. The landmark decision provides clarity on tax deductions and credits.
ITAT Mumbai held that the claim for deduction under section 80G of the Income Tax Act in respect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenses cannot be denied.
ITAT Mumbai held that provisions of section 14A r.w.s. 8D of the Income Tax Rules not invocable as assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year. Accordingly, disallowance duly deleted by CIT(A).
ITAT Mumbai held that the moment the order of the TPO is barred by limitation and quashed the assessee ceases to be an eligible assessee. Hence the time limit for completion of the assessment reverts back to 21months. Final assessment order passed after that is barred by limitation.
