ITAT Mumbai held that Broadcasting Reproduction Right is not covered under the definition of Royalty under the Income Tax Act as well as Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA.
ITAT Mumbai held that “other method” provided in Rule 10AB r.w.s. 92C (1) would be a good substitute for CUP as there is lack of reliable comparables in case of royalty transactions as royalty payments have been made for unique intangibles
In a significant decision, ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of D.C. Polyester Ltd., stating that penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act cannot be imposed for incorrect income head treatment.
Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited receives relief as ITAT Mumbai rules that investments yielding exempt income must be considered for disallowance under Rule 8D(2).
ITAT Mumbai rules that income earned from a consultancy business, even with TDS deductions, should not be taxed under Section 44ADA of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai grants relief to Central Bank of India, disallowing expenditure under Section 14A for securities held as stock-in-trade, citing the Maxopp Investment Ltd case.
In a landmark decision, ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Evermore Polymer Systems Ltd., stating that penalties under Section 271B require a reasonable opportunity to be heard.
ITAT Mumbai held that amount of compensation for defective product being capital in nature cannot be adjusted from WDV of the assets.
ITAT Mumbai ruling on penalty u/s.271B for non-maintenance of books of accounts by an assessee engaged in trading, financing, realty, and commodities business. Analysis of Varadagovind Parthasarthy Iyer vs ITO case.
ITAT Mumbai held that the material/information on which AO have re-opened the assessment is no longer existing being legally incorrect. Hence, action of AO to have issued notice of re-opening of assessment u/s 148 of the Act itself fails.
