I, therefore, dispose of this Writ Petition holding that the respondent will not invoke the bank guarantee for three months. In the meanwhile the petitioner may make all efforts before the 7th respondent to get an interim protection, pending appeal — adjudication.
Asstt. STO Vs Indus Towers Ltd. (Kerala High Court) In the present case the delivery chalan which accompanied the transport is one issued by the assessee respondent, over which the assessee has absolute control and could be subject to manipulation. The assessee having transported the goods with delivery chalan, could very well sell the goods […]
In one of the recent judgment of Kerala High Court in M/S Indus Towers Limited Vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer, it was held that goods cannot be confiscated for every non- compliance of the provisions of the act.
Sunrise Academy of Medical Specialities (India) (P.) Ltd Vs ITO (Kerala High Court) (DB) Any premium received by a Company on sale of shares, in excess of its face value; if the Company is not one in which the public has substantial interest, would be treated as income from other sources, as seen from Section […]
A.F. Babu Vs Goods and Service Tax Council & Ors. (Kerala High Court) Kerala HC held that petitioner may apply to the Nodal Officer. The petitioner applying, the Nodal Officer will look into the issue and facilitate the petitioner’s uploading FORM GST TRAN-1, without reference to the time-frame. Ordered so. It was further held that […]
In the present case, the Commissioner does not speak of absence of a written constitution. The appellant also asserts that the constitution of the Generalate regulates the Houses also, which come under the Generalate. The Tribunal also found that the appellant comes under the exclusive control of the Generalate through the hierarchies as disclosed from the constitution and there could be no separate registration granted to the Convent.
Only a land in which the building is completely constructed stands excluded under the exclusionary provision under Explanation (1 )(b)(ii) of Section 2(ea) of Wealth Tax Act, 1957
M/s. Popular Vehicles & Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (Kerala High Court) Sub-clause (va) of Section 36(1) takes care of the employee’s contribution, which stands unaffected by Section 43B as the restriction available in Section 43B is already available under the Explanation to the said clause, with a qualification of the payment being before the […]
Naga Distributors Vs. UOI & Ors. (Kerala High Court) High Court held that If the uploading of FORM GST TRAN-1 is not possible for reasons not attributable to the petitioner, the authority will also enable him to take credit of the input tax available at the time of migration. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT […]
If the petitioner applies within two weeks after receiving this judgment, the Nodal Officer will consider and take steps within a week thereafter. If the uploading of FORM GST TRAN-1 is not possible for reasons not attributable to the petitioner, the authority will also enable him to take credit of the input tax available at the time of migration.