Held that law mandates neutrality for both arbitrator and arbitrator selection process. Interim award passed by the arbitration who was appointed in contravention of provisions is unenforceable.
Held that person seeking to make payment of tax and penalty u/s. 129(1)(a) of the CGST Act cannot be deprived from filing an appeal u/s 107
Held that building constructed as residential building and given on rent for residential purpose cannot be treated as commercial building for levying building tax.
Government of Kerala has extended the benefit of maternity leave to employees appointed on contract basis irrespective of the tenure.
On 1.4.2007, the assessee took centralised registration and thereafter, the payment was not made until the show cause notice was issued. So the contention of the respondent bank that there was no suppression nor any mis-statement cannot be accepted. Section 73 of the Act gives extended period of limitation if there is suppression or misstatement or fraud or collusion.
Kerala HC held that even in cases where tax or penalty levied U/s. 129 of the GST Acts, 2017 was paid by a taxable person he can file an appeal U/s. 107 of the said Acts.
Held that when two choices are available, one under the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act and the other under such arrangement with the employer and if the latter offers better terms, the employee cannot be denied the right to receive those higher benefits.
Shibu. L.P. Vs Neelakantan (Kerala High Court) Law is settled on the point that a complaint alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be presented through the power of attorney holder and the power of attorney holder can depose and verify on oath before the court in order to […]
K.P. Shaneej Vs Joint Commissioner (Appeals) (Kerala High Court) Revenue very fairly submits that there are certain judgments of this Court which take the view that without the authenticated copy of the assessment order, an appeal cannot be filed and such authentication will be recognised by the system only when a demand is raised pursuant […]
Whether order of the Adjudicating Authority (‘NCLT’) can be challenged in a proceeding under Article 226, has been, recently, analysed in the matter of Tharakan Web Innovations Pvt. Ltd. Vs. National Company Law Tribunal (1st February, 2022) in W.P. (C) Nos. 27636 of 2020 & 14158 of 2021 before Kerla High Court.
