Jharkhand High Court held that acceptance of bribe duly proved and accordingly, a punishment of six months simple imprisonment under Section 7 of the PC Act and one year’s simple imprisonment under Section 13 (2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of the P.C. Act with a fine of Rs.1000 sentenced for accepting bribe for furnishing Income Tax clearance certificate
Petitioner is a Chartered Accountant by profession and after passing the examination, he became eligible to be appointed as an Insolvency Professional by the Committee of Creditors under Section 3(19) of IBC, 2016 for handling the companies under liquidation.
Liability of a partner for acts of the firm. Every partner is liable, jointly with all the other partners and also severally, for all acts of the firm done while he is a partner.
Demand notice issued by the tax authorities to a Senior Advocate seeking payment of service tax on legal services provided by him to a legal firm was set aside as Notification No.30/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012 had been amended by way of substitution by virtue of two consecutive notifications, i.e., Notification No. 18/2016-ST dated 01.03.2016 and Notification No.34/2016-ST dated 06.06.2016
Merely GST refund claim on the basis of averments not suffice unless & until the said claim assesse is corroborated by documentary evidence.
Held that in absence of proper show cause notice u/s. 73 (1) of the JGST Act and proper opportunity of hearing, issuance of the bank attachment notice contained in GST DRC-13 u/s. 79(1)(c) is untenable in law
HC held that merely because one party, has approached before MSME Council, Arbitration application cannot be held to be not maintainable
HC held that that if assessee disputes Section 50 GST interest liability then revenue have to follow specific procedure of Section 73 or 74
Held that action of Designated Committee by first deducting the amount of deposit made by petitioners during enquiry, investigation or audit and, thereafter, extending relief to the petitioners by computing the amount of tax due on the outstanding amount, is not as per the mandate of the Scheme.
Explore the Jharkhand High Court’s ruling in AMI Enterprises vs Union of India on GST transit violation and procedural infirmities.
