Return of income so filed was late by one minute. Therefore, deduction claimed by assessee under section 80IA(4) of Act was denied by CPC
Marvelore Mining & Allied Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) Sec. 41(1) can’t be invoked for liability against purchase of defective machinery that was never put to use: Marvelore Mining & Allied Industries (P.) Ltd. v. ITO – [2023] (Surat-Trib.) Assessee was a private limited company. It was engaged in the business of Calcium […]
ITAT Surat held that penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act not leviable merely because the assesse couldn’t make compliance due to some bonafide reasons.
ITAT Surat held that issues raised by PCIT in his order u/s 263 are already examined by AO and AO passed the assessment order after calling for all the details and considering the reply/ documents. Accordingly, assessment order passed after due application of mind cannot be termed as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.
ITAT Surat held that AO already examined the issue and took a plausible view that addition should not be made. Accordingly, revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 unsustainable as order passed by AO is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of revenue.
ITAT Surat held that bill and vouchers of the expenditure claimed by the assessee was loss on account of floods. The explanation of expenses by way of copy of accounts, names and addresses, details TDS deducted and payments by crossed account payee cheques acceptable.
ITAT Surat held that addition on the basis of un-signed/un-stamped Satakhat, which has not been registered and which is found from CD of computer of person, unsustainable.
Nirav Bipinbhai Vaghasiya Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) ITAT find that in the return of income the assessee claimed refund of TDS reflected in his Form-26AS. The CPC denied such refund in its intimation dated 08.10.2018. The assessee filed application for rectification under section 154. In the application under section 154, the assessee claimed such refund […]
ITAT Surat held that addition of entire contractual receipt is unsustainable in law as the entire receipt cannot be treated as income. In absence of any material to show net profit rate, presumptive net profit rate of 8% is to be considered as estimated income.
ITAT Surat held that there is no specific provision in the Income Tax Act that non-deciding the registration application under Section 12AA within a period of six months there shall be a deemed registration.
