Laxmi Road Lines withdraws tax appeal at ITAT Panaji after opting for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme to settle dispute over PCIT’s Section 263 order.
ITAT Panaji sets aside CIT(A)’s ex-parte order, remands case of Grameena Seva Sahakari to allow fresh hearing on Section 80P deduction denial.
ITAT Panaji remands case of Salim Ali Darugar vs. ITO concerning addition under Section 69A for unexplained demonetization cash deposits.
To ensure fairness, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A)’s order and remanded the disputed issues back to the CIT(A) for a fresh hearing. This decision was made contingent upon the assessee paying a cost of Rs. 2,000 to the Income Tax Department within one month and providing proof of payment.
ITAT allows co-operative society’s appeal for 80P(2)(a)(i) exemption, stating registration under Co-operative Societies Act prevails without RBI license.
Cooperative banks fall within definition of cooperative society under Section 2(19). ITAT concluded that assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(d).
ITAT Panaji ruled in favor of Ganga Suresh Rathod, setting aside NFAC’s order after her video hearing request was denied, citing a breach of natural justice.
Assesse being a partnership firm, engaged in the business as dealer in petroleum products who filed its return at Rs.3,00,950/-. Subsequently the case was selected for limited scrutiny.
Purpose for which loan was acquired is irrelevant to consideration of question whether expenditure/interest on such borrowed capital/loan was revenue expenditure or capital expenditure – Borkar Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Panaji)
The ITAT Panaji dismisses the appeal by Manoj Anand against a tax evasion case involving colourable devices and sham transactions. Get the details in this article.
