Inderjit Singh Mann Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) The assessee has filed copy of the sale deed dated 19.2.2009 in the paper book in which it is specifically mentioned that assessee received various advances from the purchasers on different dates in the year 2007 before execution of sale deed. According to the chart prepared by the […]
It goes without saying that in the absence of enabling powers, no disallowance can be made. As such, enabling provisions being absent, the CPC did not have the jurisdiction to make the disallowance in question, in the order u/s 143 (1) of the Act.
ITAT held that assessment order is bad in law as assessing authority passed order u/s 143(3) without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2)
ITAT Chandigarh held that the income so surrendered by way of account receivables cannot be brought to tax under the deeming provisions u/s 69 r/w section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act.
Where assessee had offered business receipts amounting to Rs 41,81,800/- in his return of income which was sufficient to make business advances of Rs 8,05,000/- there was no justifiable reason to not accept the entries in the cash book corresponding to advances of Rs 8,05,000/- made out of said business receipts.
ITAT Chandigarh held that as additional evidence submitted are essential and critical for determination of issue under consideration, matter remanded back to ld. CIT(A).
ITAT Chandigarh held that claiming of wrong depreciation on the advice of auditor is bona fide claim and hence penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not leviable.
ITAT Chandigarh held that AO not empowered to disturb the assessment order/ reassessment order which has attained finality, unless contrary material gathered in the course of proceedings u/s 153A of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition of mere book entry unsustainable as no amount has been received and no adverse interference with regard to the same has been drawn by the department.
ITAT Chandigarh held that invocation of revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act without satisfying twin conditions i.e. that the order of the AO must be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue is unsustainable in law.
