Himachal Pradesh High Court held that mere possession and recovery of currency notes from an accused without proof of demand would not enable the court to convict the accused. The proof of demand, thus, has been held to be an indispensable essentiality for an offence under Sections 7and 13 of the PC Act.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that the provisions of Section 26E of the Securitisation and Reconstructions of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI) Act, 2002 shall override the rights of others to recover the outstanding liability of taxes dues etc on the mortgaged/charged property from the original owner etc.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that the Bank has first charge over the properties being secured creditor in priority over all Other Debts, Revenues, Taxes, Cesses and Other Rates payable to the Central or State Government or Legal Authority.
Explore legal implications of changing a company’s name on property ownership and stamp duty, as examined in a case before Himachal Pradesh High Court.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that exemption u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act duly entitled even if Funds Pending Utilization was more than the prescribed limit as proved that funds were utilized for the purpose of achieving its objective.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that transfer order for transfer of Joint Commissioner of State Taxes and Excise from the office of Parwanoo to Shimla justified as allegations of malafide intentions not established with material evidences.
High Court can exercise revisional jurisdiction under Section 48 only against orders passed by Tax Tribunal either under Section 45(2) or 46(3) of H.P. VAT Act.
Himachal Pradesh High Court allowed the writ petition and directed department not to act in furtherance of order passed by appellate authority till the time appellate tribunal in term of Section 109 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is constituted.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that milk cream is different from milk. Accordingly, revision petition is dismissed and demand of tax @ 4% sustained.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that under Section 29A(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (A&C Act), there is no requirement that consent of the parties has to be expressed and that too, in writing for extending the arbitral period.
