Himachal Pradesh High Court: ITC cannot be denied solely on supplier’s retrospective GSTIN cancellation without verifying transaction genuineness.
Jain Enterprises Vs State of H. P. & Anr. (Himachal Pradesh High Court) Himachal Pradesh High Court has dismissed a petition filed by Jain Enterprises challenging a show cause notice and a subsequent demand order related to alleged excess or ineligible input tax credit under the HPGST/CGST Act. The petitioner had sought to quash a […]
Himachal Pradesh High Court disposes of petition challenging parallel GST proceedings, as one authority transfers case to another and credit ledger is unblocked.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that since order passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax is bereft of any cogent or plausible reasons the same is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, matter remanded back to AO to decide afresh.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that pending tax in respect of vehicles purchased in auction is to be paid by the auction purchaser. Also held that there is no equity in taxation law and law would prevail in case of conflict between law and equity.
Himachal Pradesh High Court defers judgment on GST Circular No. 80/54/2018, noting a pending Supreme Court case on the same matter. Interim order to continue.
Petitioner is a Pvt. Ltd. Company and registered with GST department. Petitioner was an authorized dealer of Ford India Pvt. Ltd. and was engaged in selling of motor cars, vehicle and part thereof and their repair and services.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that petitioner/ university is not liable to pay taxes on supply of food stuff and other items to students since ancillary activities of providing canteen facilities to the inmates of the University would not amount to business as defined by the Act.
Himachal Pradesh High Court dismisses petition challenging relaxed eligibility for Technical Member (State) in GSTAT, clarifying rules for state and All-India Service officers.
Court dismisses writ petition against a GST show cause notice for ₹4.37 Cr, citing the rule of alternate remedy. Decision references Supreme Court rulings on bypassing statutory appeals.
