Sreejith K. Vs State Of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) It has been brought to the notice of High Court that the requisite amount towards tax and penalty aggregating to 9,55,840/- [Rupees Nine Lac Fifty Five Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Only] has already been deposited by the supplier i.e. M/s. Izaan Trading; the writ-applicant of the […]
Milap Scrap Traders Through Pro. Harshadbhai Manubhai Patel Vs State/Commercial Tax Officer (Gujarat High Court) High Court held that the condition precedent for exercise of power under Rule 86A of the GST Rules is the availability of credit in the electronic credit ledger which is alleged to be ineligible. If credit balance is available, then […]
Ems Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner Of CGST (Gujarat High Court) It is not in dispute that one year period has elapsed since GST Electronic credit ledger came to be blocked. Rule 86A of Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 empowers the authority to block the electronic credit ledger if the authority has reason […]
Niraj Jaidev Arya Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) During the course of arguments, it was pointed out by the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicant that the respondent-Department has already attached immovable property belonging to the applicant in excess of the amount of alleged evasion or fraudulent claim of input tax credit […]
Shah Industries Through Proprietor Vishal Hastimal Sakaria Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The show cause notice is bereft on any material particulars or information. In the absence of any material particulars and the details, it is difficult for any individual to respond to such a vague show cause notice. Probably what the Authority […]
Parekh Plastichem Distributors LLP Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) The plain reading of Section-56 of the Act would indicate that if any tax, which is ordered to be refunded under Sub-section (5) of Section-54 to any applicant, is not refunded within sixty days from the date of receipt of the application under Sub-section […]
Rajkamal Healds And Reeds Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Director of Income Tax (Gujarat High Court) HC disposed of this writ application reserving the liberty for the writ applicant to file an appropriate application addressed to the Chief Commissioner Income Tax under Section 119 (2) (b) of the Act referred to above with a request to […]
Time and again, this Court as well as even the instructions instructions issued by the higher authority of the respondents, has directed the proper officer to ensure that their action of the provisional attachment should not hamper normal business activities of the taxable person.
Vinayak Metal Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) On bare perusal of the contents of the show cause notice as well as the impugned order, we find that the said show cause notice is absolutely vague, bereft of any material particulars and the impugned order is also vague and a non-speaking order. It cannot […]
Vinayak Metal Through Its Proprietor Ankit Ratilal Gunjariya Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) On bare perusal of the contents of the show cause notice as well as the impugned order, we find that the said show cause notice is absolutely vague, bereft of any material particulars and the impugned order is also vague […]
