DCIT Vs Avtec Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Deduction prescribed under section 10AA cannot be treated in the nature of exemption and as such, loss suffered by assessee in its unit eligible for deduction under section 10AA could be set off against normal business income. Keeping in view the fact that section 10AA makes the assessee eligible […]
Addition in respect of completed assessments u/s 153A be made solely on the basis of post search enquiry when no incriminating material was unearthed during search is not valid.
When assessee made it very clear in return of income that she was not maintaining any books of account, then, making addition under section 68 was untenable in law as section 68 was applicable only when credits were found in books of account of the assessee.
Process-cum-Product Development Centre Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Where assessee-society engaged only in imparting research based education/allowable skill training to students in manufacturing of sports goods and leisure equipments without any profit motive to enable them to get placement, it would cover within the definition of education u/s 2(15) and hence, entitled for exemption under […]
Mukta Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Long-term capital gains on sale of shares could not be treated as bogus on the reason that the price of these shares had risen manifolds and the reason for astronomical rise was not related to any fundamentals of market. Once the transactions were duly proved by trading from […]
ITAT Delhi rules on the treatment of surrendered sales outside books, stating only profit is taxable, not the entire sales. Full judgment details.”
Kay Dee Industries Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) Since it was not the first year of the payment of commission to the party and the recipient of the commission income was also not related party in terms of section 40A(2), therefore, revenue was only authorized to see whether the expenditure was laid out or by the […]
Where AO was satisfied from the valuation report of the Registered Valuer (approved by the Govt.) for the valuation of property furnished by assessee, he was not mandatory required to refer the matter for valuation of property to DVO.
No disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) could be made for non deduction of TDS on bank commission / guarantee fee as CBDT vide Circular No. 56/2012 had clarified that no TDS was required to be deducted on bank guarantee commission, etc. and the same was retrospective applicable.
Where services provided by employees of BGIL were merely in the nature of routine support services, the same could not be termed as ‘FTS’ under Article 13 of the India UK DTAA, therefore, there was no requirement for assessee to deduct taxes from such payments in India u/s 195.
