CESTAT Chennai allows provisional release of gold seized from Sree Venkateshwara Bullion, citing balance of convenience and following principles of natural justice.
CESTAT Chennai rules in favor of United India Insurance Co., allowing Cenvat credit for vehicle repairs despite invoices in vehicle owners’ names. Analysis and implications.
Read the full text of CESTAT Chennai’s order in the Hyundai Motors vs. Commissioner of Customs case. Relief granted due to 9-year delay in ADGFT’s customs exemption decision.
Explore the CESTAT Chennai order on whether providing investment advice abroad qualifies as export of services. Detailed analysis, conclusions, and implications.
In a Customs case, CESTAT Chennai instructs the adjudicating authority to verify EODC for Solar Soles Pvt Ltd, potential benefits to follow upon production.
Read about recent CESTAT Chennai order in case of K. Mayakrishnan vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax. Tribunal ruled that a Service Tax demand without specifying service category in Show Cause Notice is not maintainable.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Chennai order in the Sinnamani Vs Commissioner of Customs case. CESTAT quashes penalty under Section 117 of the Customs Act, citing the absence of direct evidence of connivance. Explore the analysis and conclusion of the order.
CESTAT Chennai held that demand of duty alleging violation of provisions of EPCG licenses on ground of failure to fulfill export obligation unsustainable as EPCG Committee granted extension of export obligation period for two years.
Double taxation for same service activity is not legally permissible: CESTAT Chennai ruling – Learn about CESTAT Chennai verdict forbidding double taxation for services, as per the Finance Act of 1994.
Explore the Ponni Sugars vs Commissioner of Central Excise case. CESTAT Chennai landmark ruling on CENVAT credit, bagasse, and legal implications.
