Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : K. Mayakrishnan Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 41858 of 2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/10/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

K. Mayakrishnan Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai)

CESTAT Chennai Rules in Favor of Assessee: Service Tax Demand Invalid Without Specific Service Category in Show Cause Notice (SCN)

Introduction: The recent order by CESTAT Chennai in the case of K. Mayakrishnan vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax highlights a crucial ruling. The tribunal held that a Service Tax demand lacking specification of the service category in the Show Cause Notice is not maintainable. This article provides insights into the case and the implications of the ruling.

Background of the Case: The appeal was filed by K. Mayakrishnan against the Order-in-Appeal No. 94/2014 (P)(ST) dated 06.05.2014. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Chennai, had passed this order concerning the period from April 2008 to March 2009.

Key Facts:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031