Understand why a mere delay in verification isn’t enough to allege fact suppression under Section 11A. Intent matters. Learn more in this analysis.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that scrap generated during manufacture can be removed without payment of duty for job work and can be used as inputs.
Dive into legal complexities and key takeaways of case Crown Milk Specialities Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs concerning conversion of shipping bills from Drawback to DEPB Scheme.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that service tax demand under reverse charge mechanism unsustainable in case the IPR is registered in any foreign country and is not registered in India.
CESTAT Chandigarh rules in Ahluwalia Contracts case: Free supply items’ value isn’t included in service tax calculation. Read a detailed breakdown.
Examining the CESTAT Chandigarh order on Chanakya Communication’s appeal. The judgment pertains to Cenvat Credit claim rights linked to service tax payment.
Read about the CESTAT Chandigarh order on Excise Duty for R.B. Forging (P) Ltd. vs CCE. Discover the legal insights & implications on Rough Forgings.
Analysis of Jagjeet Singh Parwana vs Commissioner of Central Excise case. Non-specific show-cause notice’s impact on Service Tax demand set aside by CESTAT Chandigarh.
Analysis of Hero Motocorp Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise case. CESTAT Chandigarh allows CENVAT credit on helmet locks supplied with motorcycles as accessories.
CESTAT Chandigarh rules weighment by Food Corporation of India (FCI) doesnot fall under Business Auxiliary Service nullifying service tax demand.
