Follow Us:

CESTAT Chandigarh

No confiscation & redemption fine when issues relates to interpretation

June 4, 2024 1857 Views 0 comment Print

Hindustan Distributors Vs Commissioner of Customs case analysis. CESTAT Chandigarh quashes redemption fine and penalty on prime pre-painted steel coils.

CESTAT Chandigarh dismisses 26 appeals due to low tax effect 

May 28, 2024 771 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chandigarh dismisses 26 appeals by the Commissioner of Customs ICD Patparganj against VSM Impex due to low tax effect, aligning with the CBIC’s monetary limit policy.

Service Tax payable under reverse charge when reimbursable expense incurred by distributor on providing service on behalf of taxable person

May 24, 2024 870 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chandigarh partly allowed Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.’s appeal against Service Tax demand, highlighting that tax under reverse charge applies when distributors incur reimbursable expenses for the taxable person. Dive into the case and understand the intricacies of the reverse charge mechanism.

Services By Microsoft India To Microsoft Singapore qualifies as export of Services

May 15, 2024 1587 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chandigarh rules in favor of Microsoft India, stating services rendered to overseas entity are exports, exempting from service tax.

Without Intent to Evade Tax extended period of limitation cannot be invoked

April 9, 2024 1194 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chandigarh order in Vinayak Industries Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs clarifying that without intent to evade tax, extended period of limitation cannot be invoked.

Consolidated notice providing multiple dates of hearing violates principles of natural justice

March 31, 2024 4164 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chandigarh deems consolidated hearing notice with multiple dates a violation of natural justice, remanding an ex parte order. Analysis and implications discussed.

Dealer Advertisement Expenses not includible in Assessable Value for Excise Duty

March 24, 2024 1152 Views 0 comment Print

Discover the legal nuances behind excluding dealer advertisement expenses from assessable value. Analysis of Suzuki Motorcycle India Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Chandigarh).

No Service Tax on Cutting Plates/Coils Job-Work: Considered as Manufacturing

March 10, 2024 1128 Views 0 comment Print

R.S.D. Steel Industries vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise: CESTAT Chandigarh rules job work of cutting steel coils/plates not liable for service tax under BAS or BSS.

Education Cess Refund: Unicorn Industries Decision Doesn’t Affect Past Final Decisions

March 6, 2024 1287 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chandigarh rules in favor of Jindal Photo Limited, allowing refund of Education Cess based on past final decisions, overruling the Unicorn Industries case.

CESTAT Chandigarh allows 12% Interest on Excise duty Refund

February 17, 2024 1029 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chandigarh orders 12% annual interest on excise duty refunds for Fujikawa Power vs CCE & ST, setting a precedent for timely financial compensations.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031