Read about CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Indian Farmers Fertiliser Co Operative Ltd Vs C.C. Kandla, allowing amendment on bill of entry u/s 149 of Customs Act before final assessment.
Dive into the dispute of classifying imported goods – natural Calcite Powder or precipitated Calcium Carbonate? Explore the impact of lab testing limitations in Acme vs C.C.-Mundra case.
CESTAT Ahmedabad dismisses plea for extended limitation in Karnavati Car Air Conditioners case. Detailed analysis of value determination for CVD in Bill of Entries.
CESTAT Ahmedabad grants import benefit to Reena Brothers, citing compliance with transitional arrangements. Details of the case and its impact on customs proceedings.
Explore the CESTAT Ahmedabad order on penalties for smuggling allegations. Understand why cross-examination is pivotal in relying on witness statements. Full analysis here.
CESTAT held that the mere location of the godown outside the factory premises should not be a basis for denial, as long as it is used for storing goods used in manufacturing.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that duty demand unsustainable as charges against appellant of creating dummy units for keeping the value of clearance below SSI exemption not established.
Faze Three Limited vs. C.C.E & S.T.-Silvasa case at CESTAT Ahmedabad: The established principle that order cannot transcend scope of show cause notice forms a robust foundation for contesting validity of demands made.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that demat/depository charges, transaction/ administrative charges and VSAP/TWS charges collected by sub brokers on behalf of the stock exchange are not liable to Service Tax.
CESTAT Ahmedabad’s order in L&T vs. C.C.-Kandla regarding taxability of processed goods leftover after completing export obligations.
