Court dismissed the writ petition arguing that the impugned assessment order under Section 147 of the Act was, in fact, an appealable order, and had been passed providing extensive reasons.
Read the full text of the judgment/order of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Winsome Highrise Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. The court quashes the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for violating principles of natural justice by denying the petitioner an opportunity for a personal hearing.
Calcutta High Court’s examination of Gurbux Singh Gupta Vs State of West Bengal scrutinizes GST Act enforcement, focusing on a vehicle’s seizure under Section 129. The case debates documentation validity and penalty imposition, emphasizing procedural adherence and legal interpretations within GST’s framework.
Explore the Calcutta High Courts ruling in Paarabhu Dayal Jajoo vs Deputy Commissioner, dismissing a writ petition on grounds of alternative remedy under the GST Act and violation of natural justice principles.
Calcutta High Court in Rajesh Kumar Agarwal Vs Union of India and Ors. The appeal was filed against the order passed under Section 148A(d) of Income Tax Act, alleging violation of principles of natural justice. Court has remanded the matter back to Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
Calcutta High Court in the case of Prabhu Dayal Jajoo vs Deputy Commissioner, State Tax allows filing of GST appeal after limitation period, considering recovery of certain sums of money from electronic cash ledger.
The Calcutta High Court quashes the Kolkata Municipal Corporation’s order to dismantle a hoarding over unpaid advertisement taxes, as no prior notice was issued to the petitioner
Calcutta High Court reaffirms Input Tax Credit (ITC) rights of a genuine buyer, even if supplier’s registration gets retroactively cancelled.
Calcutta High Court mandates re-evaluation of ETC Agro Processing’s time-barred IGST refund, overturning denial based on an unconstitutional notification.
Case between Jai Venktesh Concast Private Limited and the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, was heard by the Calcutta High Court. The writ petitioners filed an intra-court appeal against the order of the learned Single Bench, which directed them to pay 20% of the disputed tax for interim protection from recovery.
