Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jai Venktesh Concast Private Limited  Vs Deputy Commissioner Of State Tax (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : MAT/720/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/05/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jai Venktesh Concast Private Limited  Vs Deputy Commissioner Of State Tax (Calcutta High Court)

Case between Jai Venktesh Concast Private Limited and the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, was heard by the Calcutta High Court. The writ petitioners filed an intra-court appeal against the order of the learned Single Bench, which directed them to pay 20% of the disputed tax for interim protection from recovery.

The appellants contended that they should not be subjected to further conditions after already paying 10% of the disputed tax while filing an appeal before the first appellate authority. They relied on a decision of the Bombay High Court, which stated that no hardship is caused to taxpayers due to the non-formation of the GST Appellate Tribunal.

On the other hand, the State Tax Authorities argued that the decision of the Bombay High Court does not bind them.

Calcutta High Court stayed the recovery proceedings without imposing any pre-condition. The authorities are restrained from taking any coercive steps for recovery until the disposal of the writ petition. The condition imposed by the learned Single Bench regarding the deposit of 20% of the disputed tax was set aside.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031