CAAR Delhi ruled that Danisco’s palm oil-based products are correctly classified under CTH 3404 90 39, not under CTH 3824, based on HSN guidelines.
CAAR Mumbai clarifies the classification of Assy Guide Rails under Customs Tariff Act 87089900 as parts of motor vehicles, focusing on sunroof assembly usage.
Analysis of CAAR Mumbai’s ruling for Sunwoda Electronics on concessional customs duty for lithium-ion cells and parts used in manufacturing mobile battery packs.
Doosan Bobcat India seeks advance ruling on whether Skid Steer Loaders are subject to anti-dumping duty under Customs Notification 17/2023 due to technical differences.
CAAR Mumbai rules on classification of Digital Duplicators and consumables under the Customs Tariff Act, impacting import procedures.
BASF’s classification dispute on vitamin premixes for animal feed led to a Customs ruling and High Court remand for reconsideration. Full case details here.
Enviva E0 101G, a phytogenic blend used in animal feed, is classified under Heading 2309 due to its role as a premix for improving animal health and nutrition.
CAAR Delhi ruled on customs valuation of Arista Networks’ service parts under the Residual Value Method, analyzing rules from 3 to 9 of the Customs Valuation Rules.
Nokia Solutions seeks clarity on SFP classification for telecom equipment amid recent CESTAT rulings. Explore the implications for customs duty exemptions.
CAAR Delhi rules on the classification of roasted areca nuts, imported by R V International, under Customs Tariff Heading 20081920. Learn about the case specifics here.
