CAAR held that the issue of classification of distillation equipment in the applicant’s case is pending before an officer of customs. Law, doesn’t allow me to render an advance ruling in such a case.
In re Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd. (CAAR) Classification of data centre switch router models (DCS-7280CR2K-60-FApplication No. CAAR/CUS/APPL/45/2021 and DCS-7816R3-BND Series) and applicability of Sr. No. 13N of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, dated 01.03.2005 and Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs, dated 30.06.2017 on these devices Classification of (i) Networking device with Model No. N3XU6S […]
Networking devices with Model Nos. N3XU6S, N3XU5S and N3XU7S are held classifiable under sub-heading 85176290 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Passive antennas with Model Nos. S8RL4H and S8RL4G are held classifiable under subheading 85177090 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
In re Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) Classification of data centre switch models (DCS-7050SX3-96YC8-F and DCS-7010T-48-F) and applicability of Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 50/2017-Customs, dated 30.06.2017 on these devices. CAAR ruled that Data Centre Switch models (DCS-7050SX3-96YC8-F and DCS-7010T-48-F) are classifiable under sub-heading 85176290 of the first schedule to the Customs […]
In Re Spraytec India Ltd (CAAR Delhi) Product in question is a component of spray mechanism, capable of spraying fluid (aerosol) from a bottle/container. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that goods in question can also be mounted on bottle/can of Scent spray for delivery of Scent/perfume which can be containerized under pressure. Thus, […]
In re Skechers South Asia Private Ltd (CAAR Mumbai) 45th GST Council meeting was held on 17.09.2021. In the meeting, GST rate changes in order to correct inverted duty structure in footwear was discussed. The fitment committee has proposed increasing the rate on footwear having sale value less than Rs 1000 to 12% from 5%. […]
A conclusion is arrived at in respect of these transferred applications, where the applicants have failed to reaffirm their desire for obtaining an advance ruling. Hence, the applications mentioned in annex to this ruling are rejected on the ground of non-prosecution.
In re Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) Classification of four different devices, namely, Audio Receiver (Echo Link) having model no. SXP16E, Audio Transceiver and Amplifier (Echo Link Amp) having model no. K9Y29E, Media Transmission Device (Echo Auto) having model no. BP39CN, and Echo Flex having model no. C77A68. Audio Receiver (Echo Link) having […]
In re Volvo Auto India Private Limited (CAAR Delhi) vehicle kits being imported by the applicant would be covered under sub-category 1 as Completely Knocked Down kit or under sub-category 2 as motors cars in any other form; and if under sub-category 1, whether under 1(a) or 1(b), attracting effective rate of BCD of 15% […]
In Re Steelcase Asia Pacific Holdings India Private Limited (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR ruled that the components of swivel seats/chairs, proposed to be imported by the applicant in dis-assembled form, merit classification under sub-heading 94019000 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, […]
