Detailed analysis of the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings’ decision on Teachmint’s Interactive Flat Panels under Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Classification of Small Form Factor Pluggable Transceivers under Customs Tariff, along with duty eligibility under Notification No. 57/2017-Cus, is discussed.
Bundy India Ltd seeks advance ruling on the classification of fuel pump parts used in vehicles under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
CAAR Delhi ruled that Samsung’s Galaxy Ring and Sizing Kit are correctly classified under HSN 90318000 for measuring or checking instruments under Customs Tariff Act
CAAR Delhi ruled that Danisco’s palm oil-based products are correctly classified under CTH 3404 90 39, not under CTH 3824, based on HSN guidelines.
CAAR Mumbai clarifies the classification of Assy Guide Rails under Customs Tariff Act 87089900 as parts of motor vehicles, focusing on sunroof assembly usage.
Analysis of CAAR Mumbai’s ruling for Sunwoda Electronics on concessional customs duty for lithium-ion cells and parts used in manufacturing mobile battery packs.
Doosan Bobcat India seeks advance ruling on whether Skid Steer Loaders are subject to anti-dumping duty under Customs Notification 17/2023 due to technical differences.
CAAR Mumbai rules on classification of Digital Duplicators and consumables under the Customs Tariff Act, impacting import procedures.
BASF’s classification dispute on vitamin premixes for animal feed led to a Customs ruling and High Court remand for reconsideration. Full case details here.
