In re Tata Motors Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR held that the differential pressure sensor and tyre pressure monitoring system merit classification under sub-heading 90262000 of the first schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAI M/s Tata Motors Ltd. filed an application on 27.01.2022 seeking […]
In re Multi Channel Inc (CAAR Mumbai) It is clear from a plain reading of proviso (a) to sub-section (2) of section 28-1 of the Customs Act, 1962, that the question involved in the application is already pending in the applicant’s case before an officer of customs, the law does not allow CAAR to pronounce […]
In re Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) M/s. Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. (the applicant, hereinafter) had filed 10 applications for advance rulings before the Authority for Advance Rulings, Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, New Delhi (AAR, hereinafter). These applications were pending at the time of appointment of the Customs Authorities for […]
In re Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR held that wireless speaker device model no. P5B83L merits classification under heading 8518 and more specifically under subheading 85182100 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAI Ruling M/s. Amazon Seller Services Pvt. […]
In re Jabil Circuit (CAAR Mumbai) As applicant has failed to submit the requisite information and express their willingness to appear for personal hearing, CAAR order that the said application of M/s. Jabil Circuit India Pvt. Ltd. shall be treated as closed on the ground of non-prosecution. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF […]
(The interest of state requires that there should be an end to litigation) dictate that a conclusion is arrived at in respect of the said transferred application, where the applicant has failed to pursue their application for obtaining an advance ruling. Hence, I order that the said application of M/s Allanasons Pvt. Ltd. be treated as closed on the ground of non-prosecution.
In re Endress + Hauser (India) Pvt. Ltd (CAAR Mumbai) The principal function of the measuring instrument is to measure the process parameter of liquid or gases. It is possible the output from these devices may then be used for giving input to an independent process control system or process controller which compares the signal […]
In re Audio Distribution House Pvt. Ltd (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR hels that Creative Touch 5-series Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) merit classification under sub heading 84714190 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAI M/s. Audio Distribution House Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to […]
Taking into account the detailed submissions of the applicant, including the likely usage of the article under consideration, absence of specific heading/ sub-heading for HDPE woven fabric in Chapter 39, positive mention of the dust sheet in Explanatory Note to Heading 3926, I find that HDPE woven fabrics (uncoated/one-side coated/double-side coated) are most appropriately covered under residual heading 3926 and further the residual sub-heading 3926 9099 of the Customs Tariff Act ,1975.
In re Amazon Wholesale India Private Ltd (CAAR Delhi) CAAR held that HDMI Digital Media Receiver [model number K2R2TE] is also a reception apparatus for voice, image and other data in a wireless network such as LAN/WAN. It is a reception apparatus with an inbuilt PCB and software containing many applications which run on Over […]
