In re Nokia Solutions and Networks India Private Limited (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR held that the Nokia 7210 SAS products are classifiable under subheading 85176290 as routers and are eligible to avail the benefit under Sr. No. 13N of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, as amended. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAI […]
In re PN Trade and Services (CAAR Mumbai) An intelligent flight battery is a lithium-ion rechargeable and removable battery to power a drone. As per HSN explanatory notes to heading 8507, these batteries. also known as electric accumulators, are characterised by the fact that the electrochemical action is reversible so that the accumulator may be […]
In re BASF India Limited (CAAR Mumbai) The question raised in the applicant’s application for Advance Ruling was whether the said Vitamin Premixes were classifiable under Heading 23.09 or under Heading 29.36. The said question raised in the applicant’s application is the same as in number of matters decided by the Appellate Tribunal and Courts, […]
The applicant stated that each type of portable computer is available with SIM and without SIM connectivity. Communication functions, if any, are generally performed by these portable computers using Wi-Fi or wireless connectivity.
In re Audio Distribution House Pvt. Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) The digital data processing (ADP) machines have storage capability and also stored programs which can be changed as per requirement of performance of tasks. Digital machines process data in coded form. A code consists of a finite set of characters (binary code, standard six-bit ISO code, […]
In re Ballians Agro Food Processing Pvt. Ltd (CAAR Delhi) As per regulation 8(6) of CAAR Regulation, 2021 issued vide Notification No. 01/2021-Customs (N.T) dated 04.01.2021 ‘in case the defect or deficiency is not removed or made good within the time granted under sub-rule (3), the application shall be placed before the Authority Pr appropriate […]
Advance rulings on the applicability of Sr. No. 555 and 557C of the Customs Tariff Notification No. 50/2017, dated 30,06.2017 for import of cable laying vessel.
Applicant has informed that jurisdiction of this application is not Mumbai and this needs to be filed with Delhi Customs Authority for Advance Ruling and requested for permission to withdraw their application for advance rulings
In re Mitsubishi Electric India Private Limited (CAAR Delhi) The legal position regarding classification of goods in CKD/ SKD conditions are fairly settled. As per rule 2(a) of the GRI, “any reference in a heading to an article shall be taken to include a reference to that article incomplete or unfinished, provided that, as presented, […]
In re Spraytec India Ltd. (CAAR Delhi) It is not in dispute that no Show Cause Notice had been issued to the applicant by DRI, New Delhi regarding the past clearances at the time of the applicant filing application before the erstwhile AAR, even if it is acknowledged that DRI. New Delhi was investigating the issue […]
