In the Neena Uppal Vs Union of India case, Bombay High Court rules against Customs Department’s refusal to clear goods, citing lack of conformity to CAAR opinion.
Bombay High Court ruling states no writ jurisdiction on claims of GST department coercion for tax deposits, citing lack of evidence and voluntary action. Full judgment analysis.
Read the full text of the judgment where Bombay High Court quashes an assessment order, citing violation of principles of natural justice and denial of fair personal hearing.
Bombay High Court affirms eligibility under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme. Full analysis of Gautam Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner GST & Central Excise.
Bombay High Court held that provisional attachment of bank account illegal as procedure prescribed under Section 110(5) of the Customs Act since proper officer has not passed any order in writing.
Bombay High Court held that retrospective legislation cannot deprive a person of an accrued right vested in him under a statute or under the Constitution.
Bombay High Court ruling emphasizes revenue officers’ obligation to adhere to appellate decisions in quasi-judicial matters, ensuring fair tax administration.
Learn from PCIT Vs Radhashir Jewellery Co. Pvt Ltd. case why comparing new and established businesses in transfer pricing is inappropriate. Detailed analysis provided.
Bombay High Court held that MVAT Authorities would not have priority in the recourse to the assets that are secured in favour of the secured creditor and registered in priority with the Central Registry of Securitisation Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest of India (CERSAI).
Saurer Textile Solutions Pvt Ltd Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) The Bombay High Court, in the case of Saurer Textile Solutions Pvt Ltd vs State of Maharashtra, has ruled that the Maharashtra government’s action in levying stamp duty on delivery orders (DOs) falls within the state’s legislative competence. The Court bench, comprised of […]
