Bombay HC grants interim relief in JD Printers re-assessment case, opting for a different approach than in Hexaware. Notice and proceedings stayed.
Bombay HC quashes GST recovery against Trendsutra Client Services, remanding the case for a fresh hearing with instructions for a reasoned order before 31st October 2024.
The Bombay High Court ruled on Kunal Housewares Pvt. Ltd.’s IGST refund claim. The decision clarifies the conditions for refund despite higher drawback claims.
Bombay High Court quashes reassessment order against Arihant Developers, confirming their compliance with the Income Declaration Scheme 2016.
No appeal shall be allowed to the Deputy Commissioner or Commissioner under Section 406(8) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act (MMCA) without first depositing the disputed property tax excluding interest and penalties.
In the instant case, assessee was a senior citizen and a medical practitioner, had his Demat accounts frozen by the National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) under the directives of SEBI.
Assessee, an individual and a resident of UAE, had transactions with Indian citizens, who were subject to search operation and whose assessments were centralized with the Central Circle at New Delhi.
Bombay High Court held that ‘water tax’ u/s. 141(1)(a) (i) and water benefit tax u/s. 140(1)(a)(ii) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act is leviable irrespective of the fact whether water is actually consumed by the owner/occupier or not.
Bombay High Court held that initiation of reopening of assessment after expiry of four years from the end of relevant assessment year without failure on part of the petitioner to disclose any material fact fully and truly is unsustainable in law.
Bombay High Court dismissed the PIL filed by a self-styled criminology firm observing that no mandamus can be issued merely for enforcing a particular thought of an individual or an organization, if it is not supported by any legal premise.
