Bombay High Court quashes reassessment notice in Teleperformance case due to lack of application of mind in granting approval under Section 151 of the IT Act.
Bombay High Court held that the management representative cannot be treated as legally trained mind for enabling an outsider practicing Advocate to defend Respondent-workman in the domestic enquiry. Accordingly, order of industrial court is liable to be set aside.
Bombay High Court rules that service tax cannot be imposed solely on income tax return data. The department may issue a fresh notice for income from other sources.
Bombay HC sets aside entry tax order against Mediacom, citing procedural lapses. Fresh adjudication ordered with full hearing and access to key documents.
Petitioner No.1 is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act of 1860 and the Bombay Public Trusts Act of 1950. It has more than 3800 members comprising of Advocates, Chartered Accountants, and tax practitioners.
Bombay High Court orders inquiry into lost GST documents in Sheshnath Adyaprasad Singh’s case, seeking action against responsible officers.
In the abovementioned matter HC observed that all three conditions mentioned in section 220 (2A) were not co-existed and hence writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
Bombay High Court quashes CBDT order denying delay condonation for Bharat Education Society, citing procedural lapses and lack of personal hearing.
Bombay HC ruled on Anandkumar Dhanraj Rathod’s tax case, addressing natural justice claims and directing him to appeal the assessment order under IT Act.
Bombay HC quashes order by Additional CIT, emphasizing CBDT or its members must explicitly issue orders under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
