This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Mandamus Can Be Issued to Enforce Particular Thought Without Legal Basis: Bombay HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Crimeophobia – A Criminology Firm Vs Ministry of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Development and Ors. (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Crimeophobia – A Criminology Firm Vs Ministry of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Development and Ors. (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court dismissed the PIL filed by a self-styled criminology firm observing that no mandamus can be issued merely for enforcing a particular thought of an individual or an organization, if it is not supported by any legal premise.
Facts- The PIL petition has been filed by a self-styled Criminology Firm through its founder who is allegedly a Criminologist, named Mr. Snehil Dhall. In the opening paragraph of the Synopsis presented in this petition, the petitioner state...
Author Info
