Case Law Details
Case Name : PCIT Vs Aayakar Bhavan (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
PCIT Vs Aayakar Bhavan (Bombay High Court)
Matter was remitted back to ITAT for determining capital asset financed by foreign currency loan could be capitalized u/s 43A If such asset was acquired within India
Conclusion: While expounding on the positive mandate of 43A as against the negative caveat in 37(1), the Bench observed that the essential jurisdictional fact for the mandatory capitalization of such an expense u/s 43A is that the capital asset financed by the foreign currency loan in question, must have been brought into India from a country outside In
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.