Bombay High Court held that Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) could give directions only in pending assessment proceedings. Once assessment order is passed, DRP has not power to pass any direction.
Bombay High Court held that services in the nature of ‘Veterinary Services’ and ‘Technical and Laboratory Testing Services’ did not fall under taxable category of Business Auxiliary Services.
Bombay High Court held that over a span of almost two years the department has failed to respond to the application of the petitioner for provisional release of the goods. Accordingly, provisional release of goods grant due to such inaction on the part department.
Explore the case of Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma Vs. Union of India regarding GST registration cancellation, legal provisions, and the principle of natural justice.
Bombay High Court held that the reopening of the assessment order based on change of opinion without surfacing of any tangible new information is unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside.
Bombay High Court held that Para 3(a) of Circular No. 36/2010 Customs dated 23.09.2010 imposing time limits for amending shipping bills is ultra vires of Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Bombay High Court quashes a 25-year-old show cause notice, citing delay and lost records, allowing refund with interest in EPL Ltd. vs. Union of India case.
Explore the case of Darshana Anand Damle vs. DCIT in the Bombay High Court regarding a land development agreement and its tax implications.
Explore Vaman Prestressing Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT case where Bombay High Court discusses reopening of assessments, commercial expediency, and need for a valid belief.
Bombay High Court has quashed cancellation of GST registration in case of Ramji Enterprises & Ors. Learn more about judgment and its implications.
