Explore the ITAT Bangalore case Ananda Social & Education Trust vs ACIT. Analysis of MBBS Management Quota fees suppression and legal conclusions. Learn more.
The issue under consideration is whether the officer is correct in rejecting claim for deduction u/s 10AA of the Act on the amount of transfer pricing adjustment voluntarily made by the assessee?
Smt. Zeelia Zeena Mayzean Shenoy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The issue under consideration is whether or not income paid on interest against the fixed deposits can be said to have been incurred ‘wholly and exclusively’ for the purpose of earning interest income from fixed deposits? In the present case, the assessee made fixed deposit with […]
The issue under consideration is that whether the expenditure incurred for CSR will also be qualified for deduction under section 80G?
Smt. Subbalakshmi Kurada Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The issue under consideration is that if the assessee reinvested capital gains in purchase of new residential house in the name of assessee and his son together then whether assessee in entitle to the full amount of exemption u/s 54? As per Section 54, it mandates that the […]
CBDT’s instruction No.10/2017 dated 15.11.2017 has clearly laid down that only when receipts are completely omitted to be declared in the return of income can there be an addition for invoking 143(1)(a)(vi) of the Act.
Assessing Officer tinkered the book profit by adding the additional revenue on account of subsequent realization of export, while computing the book profit u/s 115JB of the Act. The assessee has revised the return of income by including the additional revenue in its total income.
ITO Vs P.N. Krishnamurthy (ITAT Bangalore) According to Section 292BB of the Act, if the assessee had participated in the proceedings, by way of legal fiction, notice would be deemed to be valid even if there be infractions as detailed in said Section. The scope of the provision is to make service of notice having […]
Payments made by assessee towards toll-free telephone charges is royalty, in terms of section 9(1)(vi) of the Act, and is liable to deduct TDS under section 194J of the Act. We therefore are in agreement with the view taken by Ld.CIT (A).
The issue under consideration is that whether deduction u/s 80-IC will be allowed against service charges since services rendered were part of business and also involved manufacturing activity?
