In re Tvl. Vallalar Borewells (GST AAAR Tamilnadu) Essentially, the moot point is whether the bore well drilling activity undertaken by the appellant on agricultural lands is qualified for the entry no. 54 of notfn. No. 12/2017-CGST(R). It is noted that the appellant while undertaking the borewell drilling activity for industries etc., (other than on […]
In re Wipro Enterprises Pvt Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka) As regards the rate of tax on alcohol-based hand sanitizer, the goods falling under Chapter Heading 3808 attract a tax rate of 9% CGST and 9% SGST in terms of entry Sl.No 87 of Schedule III of Notification No. 11/2017 CT (R) dated 28-06-2017. With effect […]
In re SI AIR Springs Private Limited (GST AAAR Tamilnadu) In the case at hand, the product is not a joint, washer or the like, it is an ‘Air bellow’, a specifically designed part for use in the Motor Vehicle as a Shock absorbent and therefore, even if the part which gives the essential character […]
In re Teretex Trading Private Limited (GST AAR West Bengal) Whether supply of services by the applicant by way of arranging sales of goods to the recipient located outside the country shall be considered as ‘export of services’ or not? In the instant case, the applicant has admitted that he procures purchase order for supply […]
In re Apar Industries Ltd. (GST AAAR Gujarat) Marine pressure tight cables and non-pressure tight cables manufactured and supplied by the applicant to the Indian Navy are essential and integral parts of the submarine warship and hence the benefit of reduced rate of GST of 5% is available to the appellant as per Sr. No. […]
In re Jayant Snacks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd (GST AAAR Gujarat) Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling in their ruling has ruled that the product in question ‘different shapes and size Papad’ merit classifiable under CTH No. 21069099 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 on the grounds that PAPAD is a thing entirely different and distinct from […]
In re Jayant Food Products (GST AAAR Gujarat) Therefore, we are of the view that applicant’s products of different shapes and sizes of papad, whose pictures are reproduced above, are nothing but Papad, classifiable under Tariff Item 1905 90 40 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Now, the question which arises is, would it be […]
In re Piyush Jayantilal Dobaria (Jay Khodiyar Agency) (GST AAAR Gujarat) The product different shapes and sizes Papad involved in the present case merit classification under Tariff heading No. 19059040 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and chargeable to NIL rate of Goods and Services Tax as per Sl. No. 96 of Notification No. 02/2017-CT […]
In re SKG-JK-NMC Associates(JV) (GST AAAR Gujarat) ‘Work Contract’ allotted to the appellant by M/s. RITES ltd. undoubtedly pertains to Railways only. We therefore find and conclude that the ‘Work Contract’ allotted to the appellant by M/s. RITES ltd. is covered under Clause 3(v)(a) of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended from time to […]
In re Prag Polymers (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh) The classification of the ‘Switch Board Cabinet’, manufactured as per the specific design and layout provided by the Railways and supplied to the Indian Railways only and no- Where else, falls under Chapter Heading 8607 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF APPELLATE […]