Follow Us:

Advance Rulings

AAR rejects application as proceedings on similar issue was pending before DGGI

November 5, 2021 1221 Views 0 comment Print

In Re M/s. Megha Engineering & Infrastructures Limited (GST AAR Telangana) In the present case as the DGGI, Hyderabad has conducted search of the premises of the applicant under Chapter-XIV of the CGST Act, 2017. It was addressed by the authority to ascertain whether any proceeding is pending before them regarding the questions raised by […]

ITC not allowed if concessional rate of 5% GST is opted

November 3, 2021 43209 Views 0 comment Print

In re Sri Krishna Logistics (GST AAR Telangana) 1 (A) Whether the rate of GST of 5% (2.5% each towards CGST & SGST) as per Sl.No.8(ii)(b) of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rates), dt: 28-06-2017 with the condition that input tax credit is not allowed on goods and services. ITC is not allowed to be claimed if concessional […]

GST advance rulings are applicable within the particular state only

November 2, 2021 5586 Views 0 comment Print

In re Kamdhenu Agrochem Industries LLP (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- Whether the Applicant is required to obtain the registration in importing States other than Maharashtra, if goods are imported, sold and delivered directly from CFS (Container Freight Station) / DPD (Direct Port Delivery) which is under the Customs Boundaries to customers from those States? Answer:- In […]

GST payable on renting of property to Govt for under-privileged girls

November 2, 2021 2049 Views 0 comment Print

In re Meerabai Tukaram Borade (GST AAR Maharashtra) No GST exemption on renting of property to Govt for under-privileged Girl in absence of Proper Info: AAR AAR, Maharashtra held that, services provided by M/s Meerabai Tukaram Borade (Applicant) to Samaj Kalyan Department (SKD), Government of Maharashtra (GOM), for residential accommodation of underprivileged girls is not […]

GST on services by Govt for residential accommodation of underprivileged girls

November 2, 2021 1023 Views 0 comment Print

In re Shital Tukaram Borade (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- In the instant case, whether the services provided by us to Samaj Kalyan Department, State Government of Maharashtra (Social Welfare Department) for residential accommodation of underprivileged girls is exempt from GST? Answer: Answered in the negative. Question 2:- Whether TDS provisions will be applicable in […]

IGST applies on Supply of goods outside India from Outside India between 01.07.2017 to 31.01.2019

November 2, 2021 2601 Views 0 comment Print

In re SPX Flow Technology India Pvt. Ltd (GST AAAR Gujarat) In view of the foregoing, the Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/102/2020 dated 14.10.2020 is confirmed to the extent it has been appeal against, by holding that the Integrated Goods and Services Tax was payable by the appellant M/s. SPX Flow Technology (India) Pvt. Ltd. from […]

TDS under GST applicable if services not exempt from GST

November 2, 2021 4779 Views 0 comment Print

In re Tukaram Pundalik Borade (GST AAR Maharashtra) The applicant has submitted that the Samaj kalyan Vibhag of the Government of Maharashtra has taken the immovable property on rent from the applicant to house the girls from the backward class communities which can be considered as a welfare measure undertaken by the Government for the […]

GST on narrow woven fabric of Polypropylene yarn with selvedges on both edges

November 2, 2021 2892 Views 0 comment Print

In re M/s. Rajivkumar Giriraj Bansal (Proprietor of M/s. Gujarat Plast Industries) (GST AAAR Gujarat) The product narrow woven fabric of Polypropylene yarn of width not exceeding 30 cms provided with selvedges on both edges manufactured by the appellant merit classification under Tariff heading No. 58063990 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, attracting rate of […]

Stovec Industries Ltd. is not an ‘intermediary’ under IGST Act, 2017: AAAR

November 2, 2021 2031 Views 0 comment Print

AAAR modified the ruling passed by the AAR, Gujarat and held that, supply of installation/up-gradation of machines and training services for and on behalf of the Company located outside India, by the supplier in India will not fall under the definition of ‘intermediary’.

Papad (Fried) of different shapes & sizes classifiable under CTH No. 19059040

November 2, 2021 3327 Views 0 comment Print

In re Barkatbhai Noordinbhai Velani (M/s. Alisha Gruh Udyog) The product ‘fried – different shapes and sizes Papad’ involved in the present case merit classification under Custom Tariff heading (CTH) No. 19059040 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and chargeable to 18% rate of Goods and Services Tax as per Sl. No. 16 of Schedule-III […]

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930