In re Golden Tobie Private Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) As such, the promotional scheme of additional 30 packs of cigarettes on every purchase of 100 packs of cigarettes for the payment of 100 packs of cigarettes is a taxable supply of 130 packs of cigarettes on the price of 100 packs of cigarettes. There […]
In re Divyajivan Healthcare LLP (GST AAR Gujarat) Whether lump-sum amount received for Health care Services to be provided for 20 years by the applicant as ‘Diamond Plan’ is exempted from Goods and Services Tax as per Sr. No. 74 of Notification No. 12/2017- CT(R)? On careful consideration of the applicant’s submission, we find that […]
Mah AAR rejected the subject application as being non-maintainable as per Section 95 of the CGST Act because the Applicant has firstly raised questions as a recipient of services and secondly the questions are in respect of past and completed supply as on the date of the application and not a supply, which is being undertaken/proposed to be undertaken.
In Re Spraytec India Ltd (CAAR Delhi) Product in question is a component of spray mechanism, capable of spraying fluid (aerosol) from a bottle/container. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that goods in question can also be mounted on bottle/can of Scent spray for delivery of Scent/perfume which can be containerized under pressure. Thus, […]
In re SKS Infra Projects (GST AAR Rajasthan) In the case at hand, the applicant had not furnished any documentary evidence to substantiate their proposed scope of work, mode of supply (i.e. whether supply of goods or service or both) in the form of any work Order, quantum of goods or service or both to […]
In re Skechers South Asia Private Ltd (CAAR Mumbai) 45th GST Council meeting was held on 17.09.2021. In the meeting, GST rate changes in order to correct inverted duty structure in footwear was discussed. The fitment committee has proposed increasing the rate on footwear having sale value less than Rs 1000 to 12% from 5%. […]
A conclusion is arrived at in respect of these transferred applications, where the applicants have failed to reaffirm their desire for obtaining an advance ruling. Hence, the applications mentioned in annex to this ruling are rejected on the ground of non-prosecution.
In re Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) Classification of four different devices, namely, Audio Receiver (Echo Link) having model no. SXP16E, Audio Transceiver and Amplifier (Echo Link Amp) having model no. K9Y29E, Media Transmission Device (Echo Auto) having model no. BP39CN, and Echo Flex having model no. C77A68. Audio Receiver (Echo Link) having […]
In re Garware Industries Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question: – Whether as per Notification no. 20/2019 dated 30/09/2019, services provided by Garware industries Limited falls under clause (id) Heading 9988. Answer:- The Impugned services provided by applicant falls under clause (id) Heading 9988. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA PROCEEDINGS (Under […]
In re Accurex Biomedical Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question: – HSN Classification and GST rate to be charged on below products: 1. Turbilatex C-reactive protein (CRP) infinite 2. HbA1c infinite Answer:- The said products are classifiable under Heading 38.22 and under Sr.No 80 of Schedule II of the Notification No. 1/2017 – Central Tax […]
