In re Sheen Electroplaters Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) What is the GST Rate applicable for Job work service? The applicant in into provision of various electro plating services on the goods received under delivery challan from their customers and returns the goods after doing the needful. The applicant purchases various raw material for provision […]
In re Workplace Options India Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) we proceed to examine the issue as to whether the service received by the applicant from M/s Beacon, USA is covered under import of service or not. We invite reference to Section 2 (11) of IGST Act, 2017, in terms of which ‘import of Service‘ […]
In re Genesis Trade (GST AAR Karnataka) a. Whether provision of service to foreign buyer over the matil and mobile communication is chargeable in India? b. If Chargeable to tax then at what rate? But the Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling vide their letter dated 05.10.2021 FULL […]
In re Polyhydron Systems Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether the classification of Hydraulic Power Pack falling under HSN 8412 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as adopted to GST can be treated as Part of heading 8906 attracting 5% IGST (2.5% CGST + 2.5% KGST) as per Schedule I (Sr. No.252) of Notification No.1/2017-Central Tax […]
The Applicant has sought an advance ruling that as per entry number 26 of Service Rate Notification whether job work services of anodizing, plating on the materials sent by their customers i.e. registered persons, falls under item number (id) which attracts 12% tax rate or whether it falls under item number (iv) which attracts 18% tax rate.
In re Golden Hatcheries (GST AAR Karnataka) 1. The rate of tax on the EPC contract of the construction of poultry farm on immovable property with all the equipments is as per serial number 3 of item number (ii) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 at the rate of 9 % CGST and […]
In re Sree Vinayaka Enterprises (GST AAR Karnataka) 1. Whether the applicant is correct in classifying the services provided to the Government entities as exempted services? The applicant is incorrect in classifying the manpower services provided to the organisations/ institutions as exempted services since the same is not provided by way of any activity in […]
The word ‘per unit of accommodation’ should be understood as per general practice adopted by large number of service provider in similar business model. In hotels, generally it fixes per room, per suit whereas in hostels, inns and dharmshalas, it fixes per room, per bed, per seat and per person. From the facts mentioned by the appellant, it would emerge that they provides accommodation service in hostel and fix the tariff on the basis of hostel seat, therefore, we agreed the contention of appellant and finds that hostel seat should be considered as a unit of accommodation.
CAAR held that the issue of classification of distillation equipment in the applicant’s case is pending before an officer of customs. Law, doesn’t allow me to render an advance ruling in such a case.
In re Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd. (CAAR) Classification of data centre switch router models (DCS-7280CR2K-60-FApplication No. CAAR/CUS/APPL/45/2021 and DCS-7816R3-BND Series) and applicability of Sr. No. 13N of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, dated 01.03.2005 and Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs, dated 30.06.2017 on these devices Classification of (i) Networking device with Model No. N3XU6S […]
