The word ‘per unit of accommodation’ should be understood as per general practice adopted by large number of service provider in similar business model. In hotels, generally it fixes per room, per suit whereas in hostels, inns and dharmshalas, it fixes per room, per bed, per seat and per person. From the facts mentioned by the appellant, it would emerge that they provides accommodation service in hostel and fix the tariff on the basis of hostel seat, therefore, we agreed the contention of appellant and finds that hostel seat should be considered as a unit of accommodation.
CAAR held that the issue of classification of distillation equipment in the applicant’s case is pending before an officer of customs. Law, doesn’t allow me to render an advance ruling in such a case.
In re Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd. (CAAR) Classification of data centre switch router models (DCS-7280CR2K-60-FApplication No. CAAR/CUS/APPL/45/2021 and DCS-7816R3-BND Series) and applicability of Sr. No. 13N of Notification No. 24/2005-Customs, dated 01.03.2005 and Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs, dated 30.06.2017 on these devices Classification of (i) Networking device with Model No. N3XU6S […]
Networking devices with Model Nos. N3XU6S, N3XU5S and N3XU7S are held classifiable under sub-heading 85176290 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Passive antennas with Model Nos. S8RL4H and S8RL4G are held classifiable under subheading 85177090 of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
In re Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) Classification of data centre switch models (DCS-7050SX3-96YC8-F and DCS-7010T-48-F) and applicability of Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 50/2017-Customs, dated 30.06.2017 on these devices. CAAR ruled that Data Centre Switch models (DCS-7050SX3-96YC8-F and DCS-7010T-48-F) are classifiable under sub-heading 85176290 of the first schedule to the Customs […]
In re Sneha Farms Private Limited (GST AAR Telangana) In the reference 1st cited, M/s. Sneha Farms Private Limited, Hyderabad has sought certain clarification by filing an application for Advance Ruling. Through the reference 2nd cited, Superintendent (Central Tax) Kondapur Range was requested to go through the attachment and inform the above pendency of the […]
In re Geetee Tours Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether Toyota Innova Or Equivalent Vehicles (6 Seater) registered in Tourist category with All India Tourist Permit provided for carrying Covid 19 patients for Medical Treatment would be considered as Taxable Services Or Exempted Services? We find that even though the applicant has submitted that the […]
In re Deccan Wheels (GST AAR Maharashtra) Maharashtra AAR rule that ITC can’t be claimed on indirect expenses when dealer is engaged in selling of second hand goods Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (Mah AAR) ruled that Input Tax Credit cannot be claimed on Indirect Expenses like rent, commission, professional fees, telephone incurred for purpose […]
In re Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (GST AAR Maharashtra) Section 95 of the CGST Act, 2017 allows Advance Ruling authority to decide the matter in respect of supply of goods or services or both, undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. We find that the applicant has not undertaken the supply in […]
In re Rahul Goyal (GST AAR Rajasthan) In the instant case, the applicant intends to provide Educational and Training Services to its service recipient i.e. M/s Mentors Eduserv on the basis of section 13 of the agreement dated 10.02.2020. on gone through the section 13 of the agreement, we find that there is no establishment […]
