In re KPC Projects Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra) In the instant case there is Composite supply of works contract provided to UPRNN, a Government Entity by way of construction of a Residential Quarters meant for the use of the employees of ESIC and therefore, it can be said that the supply is in respect of […]
In re Baranj Coal Mines Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) In the subject case, we find that the applicant (supplier of service) and KPCL (recipient of service) are not related persons and price is the sole consideration for the supply. Further, from Article 6.1.3 and Article 29.1.2 of the Mining Agreement it is clear that […]
In re Karve Institute of Social Service (GST AAR Maharashtra) The applicant has submitted a letter dated 28.04.2022 and requested that they may be allowed to voluntarily withdraw their subject application filed on 01.09.2021. The request of the applicant to withdraw their application voluntarily and unconditionally is hereby allowed, without going into the merits or […]
AAR ruled that installation services for highway lighting systems cannot be considered as Construction services under SI. No. 3(iv)(a) of Notification No. 11/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) thus, ineligible to benefit of 12% GST.
AAR held that no GST shall be levied on services provided to educational institution for conducting entrance examination.
In re Triveni Engicons pvt ltd (GST AAR Chhattisgarh) What is the rate of tax for the workers like contract of goods and services? i. For the proposed feeder line of East West Rail Corridor within the leasehold boundary of project for coal evacuation through Rail at Gevra Opencast of Gevera Area of SECL the […]
Concessional rate of CGST @ 0.75% as per entry No.3(i) of the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended by the Notification No. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) dated 29.03.2019 is not applicable to the applicant as the said entry is applicable only to the promoters, but not to the sub-contractors.
In re CLR Skills Training Foundation (Beeup Skills Foundation) (GST AAR Maharashtra) AAR find that, both the Agreements attached by the applicant as ‘Specimen Copies” in respect of the subject application do not provide a clear picture of the actual facts in respect of the present matter before us and we therefore, cannot answer the […]
In Re Aryan Contractor Pvt Ltd (GST AAR Maharashtra) The questions for obtaining an Advance Ruling can be asked by a supplier of goods or services or both, only in relation to the supply being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken and not in relation to any supply of goods or services or both which […]
AAR held that assessee providing marketing services to a foreign company and acting as a conduit between a foreign company and its Indian customers to be considered as intermediary.
