ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unsecured loan unjustified as no information/ material proved that assessee was beneficiary of accommodation entry of loan. Addition merely on the basis of investigation report not justified.
The assessee company is engaged in business of manufacturing and has filed the return of income for the assessment year 2012-13 on 27/09/2012 disclosing a total income of Rs.1,21,67,790/- and the return of income was processed u/sec. 143(1) of the Act.
In the alternate, assessee has also raised a ground that Assessing Officer ought to have allowed the expenditure incurred in cultivation of white button mushrooms and also the depreciation from the gross sales.
ITAT Mumbai held that services rendered by the appellant is taxable in Japan in accordance to Article 12 of the India-Japan DTAA hence Foreign Tax Credit ought to have been granted to Appellant for taxes withheld in Japan.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that dismissal of appeal due to non-prosecution without adjudicating the issue on merits deprives the assessee of fair opportunity of being heard hence violating the principles of natural justice.
ITAT Mumbai held that matter regarding addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act remanded back for fresh consideration directing appellant to file all documents/ details and supporting evidence explaining source of cash deposits.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that the cooperative society is eligible for deduction U/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act on the interest income received from investment in banks. Thus, appeal allowed.
The assessee filed the return of income declaring a total income of Rs. Nil. However, AO completed the assessment u/s. 143(3) read with Section 144B determining the assessed income at Rs. 3,37,97,789/-.
Delhi ITAT overturns penalty on ex-serviceman and Mother Dairy agent for non-audit under Section 271B, citing his limited commission income and absence of books.
ITAT Delhi cancels ₹1,09,807 penalty u/s 271B for Ved Singh, acknowledging his commission-based income and reasonable belief on tax audit requirement.
