Sponsored
    Follow Us:

All ITAT

Addition u/s. 69C deleted as outstanding trade creditors clearly established: ITAT Chennai

November 29, 2024 1731 Views 0 comment Print

The present appeal is preferred by the revenue. The only issue in this appeal of the Revenue is against the order of CIT(A) deleting addition made by the AO towards unexplained expenditure u/s.69C of the Act in respect of trade payable settled outside books of accounts.

Compensation for cancelling allotment due to non-delivery in time is capital receipt

November 29, 2024 2151 Views 0 comment Print

CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal and directed the AO to re-compute the “Income From Other Sources” after deducting the amount of Rs 24,25,426/-u/s 57(iii) of the Act. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.

GST not includible while computing presumptive income u/s. 44B: ITAT Mumbai

November 28, 2024 924 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Mumbai held that Goods and Services Tax (GST) amount while computing presumptive income under section 44B of the Income Tax Act cannot be included. Thus, issue decided in favour of assessee.

Addition u/s. 69A to extent of redeposit of cash withdrawn untenable: ITAT Bangalore

November 28, 2024 981 Views 0 comment Print

Appellant has preferred the present appeal. The solitary issue that is raised is whether CIT(A) is justified in confirming the addition of Rs.35,13,000/- as unexplained money by invoking the provisions of section 69A of the Act.

Addition u/s. 43CA deleted by taking stamp duty value on date of registration of agreement

November 28, 2024 1407 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Mumbai deleted additions made under section 43CA of the Income Tax Act by considering the stamp duty value on the date of registration of agreement as prescribed under section 43CA(3) of the Income Tax Act.

Delay of around 6 years condoned since bonafide belief is sufficient cause: ITAT Bangalore

November 28, 2024 4857 Views 0 comment Print

We have to examine delay as excessive or inordinate based on whether there is a reasonable cause for not filing the appeal on time by the assessee and in our view when there is a reasonable cause, the period of delay may not be relevant factor.

Matter remitted to CIT(A) as condonation application dismissed without considering reasons

November 28, 2024 327 Views 0 comment Print

It is important to note here that CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine without adjudicating on merits. The CIT(A) held that there is a delay of 640 days in filing the appeal before him and there is no reasonable cause for condoning the same.

Order u/s. 201(1) passed beyond prescribed time limit untenable: ITAT Delhi

November 28, 2024 534 Views 0 comment Print

Held that in the instant case the time limit for passing order u/s 201(1) of the Act pertaining to financial year 2010-11 where a statement u/s 200 of the Act has been filed was two years from the end of the financial year in which such statement was filed.

PCIT expressing different view by invoking section 263 not justified: ITAT Ahmedabad

November 28, 2024 828 Views 0 comment Print

The assessment order u/s. 143(3) of the Act was passed on 03-07-2015 determining total income of Rs. 11,70,590/-. Thereafter, reassessment proceedings initiated and order u/s. 147 r.w.s. 144B was passed on 28-03­2022 by accepting the returned income.

No Penalty on Another Charge if Section 271B Notice was Based on Non-Existing Infringement

November 28, 2024 471 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Lucknow quashes penalty u/s 271B for failure to file audit report, stating incorrect grounds for penalty initiation.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
February 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728