Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nandaleke Harindra Shetty Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Nandaleke Harindra Shetty Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore deleted addition under section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act to the extent of cash deposits made towards agricultural income and cash withdrawn which was redeposited. Accordingly, appeal partly allowed.

Facts- Appellant has preferred the present appeal. The solitary issue that is raised is whether CIT(A) is justified in confirming the addition of Rs.35,13,000/- as unexplained money by invoking the provisions of section 69A of the Act.

Conclusion- Held that the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930