ITAT Delhi held that as non-renewal doesn’t amount to termination, accordingly, receipt of compensation on account of non-renewal of contract cannot be taxed under section 28(ii)(e) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that if the duration of software license is less than two years, then it should be treated as revenue expenditure and if the duration is more than two years, then it should be treated as capital expenditure.
ITAT Bangalore held that addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act unjustified as source of fund duly explained. Rejection of the explanation relating to source of fund by the department without sufficient reason is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that genuineness and veracity of the party cannot be doubted merely because the cold storage rent was received in cash. Accordingly, addition u/s. 69 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained investment unjustified.
Explore the detailed analysis of Kesar Alloys & Metals Pvt. Ltd. vs. Director of Income Tax (ITAT Indore) case, focusing on penalty levied under section 271FA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Read about the ITAT Bangalore’s order directing re-adjudication on the deduction under Section 80P(2)(e) for agricultural loans provided by Savanoor Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Ltd.
Read about the ITAT Mumbai ruling in Inderjit Singh Manchanda vs. CIT case, where the application for condonation of delay regarding penalty proceedings appeal was dismissed.
Read about the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling in Bharatkumar Gangaram Patel vs. ITO case, where the addition for unexplained LTCG on shares was deleted due to failure to establish bogus sale.
ITAT Mumbai concluded that the enhancement of the value of sales without corresponding adjustments to purchases was erroneous.
Dhirajlal Savailal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) If the receipt is not liable to tax in the hands of the recipient for any reason, the same cannot be a ground for not granting credit for TDS.
