AO was justified in treating the payment to ROC for increase in capital as capital expenditure as ROC expenses was fees for enhancement of capital.
Sahara India Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) AO made the addition on the basis of tax audit report where it was mentioned that an amount of Rs. 31,63,861/- towards leave encashment unpaid is disallowed u/s 43B. The CIT(A), following the orders of his predecessor for preceding so many assessment years, deleted the […]
Bank of India – Kirkee Branch Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, it was held by the Hon’ble Tribunal that expired time limit does not get revived with the extended time limit inserted later on. Held: In present facts of the case, the assessee-bank accepted deposits from its customers, on […]
Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Undisputedly, the assessee has earned the interest income from the deposit made towards bank guarantee and temporary parking of surplus funds. It is evident, the assessee has no other activity of earning income except export of ITES through its 10A unit. Thus, it can be safely […]
Global Health Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) A plain reading of section 45(2) makes it amply clear that it is the prerogative of the assessee to covert the capital asset to stock. Further, the term ‘Business carried on by him’ necessarily means that the capital asset so converted must form part of stockin-trade of […]
Trimble Solutions Corporation Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) We find that the issue involved in the present appeal i.e as to whether the payments received by the assessee from its distributor for sale of specialized software and maintenance and support services (including upgrades) could be held as “royalty” as per Article 12 of the India-Finland tax […]
Nike India Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Bengalore) There is no dispute that the parent company Nike Inc., has introduced new products and the samples are supplied to third party distributors in order to create awareness of new products amongst the public. The assessee herein is merely an intermediary between M/s Nike Inc and the […]
Red Hat India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Upon careful consideration we find that assessee has been following consistent system of revenue recognition. The assessee is inter alia engaged in the business of marketing, promotion and sale of ‘Red Hat subscriptions’ to customers in Indian sub-continent to avail support services that are for the […]
Hyundai Construction Equipment India Private Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Ground no.8 of the appeal is against making transfer pricing adjustment on entity level rather than restricting it to the AE transactions. The TPO computed the transfer pricing addition by considering revenues from Manufacturing segment‘ in totality at the entity level The DRP did not […]
Vinay Kumar Dhingra (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Contention of Assessee: 1. The assessee fulfills all conditions specified u/s. 10(38) 2. Though the purchase of securities are off market, the sale of shares was made online on which STT has been duly paid. 3. The shares were held for approximately 18 to 20 months 4. […]
