Mumbai ITAT rules in Lalita Troy Caeiro Vs ITO case that assessment can’t be reopened beyond 4 years if there’s full disclosure by assessee. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
in terms of section 249(4)(a) of the Act, stipulation as to payment of tax ante filing of first appeal is only directory and not mandatory, where appeal is filed without payment of tax but subsequently required amount of tax is paid, appeal shall be admitted on making payment of tax and taken up for hearing on merits.
Explore the detailed analysis of JS Capital LLC Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) regarding the offsetting of Short Term Capital Loss (STCL) against Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) under section 70(2) of the Income Tax Act.
Appellant’s bank statements confirm full payment, complying with Section 56(2)(x)(b)(B). ITAT deletes addition of Rs. 60.1 Lakhs. Detailed analysis & conclusion.
In the case of Pukhraj Nathmal Jain Vs ITO, ITAT Mumbai deletes addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act, as the source for deposits made during demonetisation period was substantiated.
In the case of Piramal Enterprises Ltd vs DCIT, ITAT Mumbai directed deletion of Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) addition on business promotion expenses due to absence of an employer-employee relationship.
In the case of Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT, ITAT Delhi directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Assessing Officer (AO) to delete the adjustment made on account of the arm’s length price (ALP) of export commission payment.
Chennai ITAT ruled that the notice issued by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 153C of the Income Tax Act for the subject assessment year was barred by limitation and void ab initio
Explore the case of Mahesh Gurram Vs ITO, where ITAT Vishakhapatnam dismisses the appeal as time barred due to insufficient cause for delay. Read the detailed analysis here.
Even if income of Non-resident on which tax is deducted, is not taxable in India, credit is to be given for TDS on such income and excess TDS is to refunded to taxpayer.
