Madras High Court has allowed withdrawal request of the petitioner in the Writ of Declaration filed in order to declare the demand order issued against the petitioner quashed in view of the resolution plan
Patna High Court held that ex parte order passed without assigning any reasons sufficient even decipherable from the record is liable to be set aside as passed in violation of the principles of natural justice.
R. K. Copper and Alloy LLP Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Applications for refund of IGST and duty drawback on export of Goods. However, on the ground that some investigation is pending, the applications were not processed. The Hon’ble High Court referred to Circular dated 23/01/2020, Press release dated 29/10/2017 and Circular No. […]
Delhi High Court addresses compliance issues in the case of Ansal Properties & Neelam Bhutani. Key points on Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the court’s decision.
HC allowed petition filed by assessee to seek reimbursement of additional tax liability on implementation of GST law for contracts and work orders which had been executed before GST regime.
Calcutta High Court held that Income Tax authorities can initiate afresh proceedings if the previous proceeding were invalid as per law.
Stalco Consultancy & Systems Private Limited Vs PCIT (Orissa High Court) HC relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal and quashed notices under Section 148 of the Act which were issued prior to 1st April, 2021 but beyond the period of six years after the expiry of the relevant […]
Considering the provision of Section 68 that the assessee has to prove three conditions i.e. (i) identity of the creditor; (2) capacity of such creditor to advance money; and (iii) genuineness of the transactions. If all the aforesaid three conditions are proved, the burden shifts on the revenue to prove that the amount belong to the assessee. However, the assessee cannot be asked to prove source of source or the origin of origin.
Umesh Kumar Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others (Allahabad High Court) The purpose of inserting the provision under Rule 23 of GST Rules, 2017 as to service of notice upon the assessee is to provide an opportunity to him to move a revocation application so as to save the registration from being cancelled permanently […]
PCIT Vs Karuna Garg (Delhi High Court) PCIT states that ITAT has erred in deleting the additions on account of bogus Long-Term Capital Gain on sale of penny stock company namely M/s Goldline International Finvest Ltd. on the ground that the assessing officer has not made independent enquiry. ITAT held that In the absence of […]
