Siddhabali Stone Gallery Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) Considering the documents placed on record which reveal that the petitioner had paid the integrated goods and services tax on the goods in question at the time of import thereof as well as the fact that after the conveyance came to be intercepted, the petitioner […]
CIT (E) Vs Kanakia Art Foundation (Bombay High Court) We have perused the objects of the trust with a special focus on the objects which the Commissioner has referred to for holding that they are not charitable in nature. The Commissioner has referred to clause (f) of the objects but reproduced only part of it […]
If only a part of the amount deposited in the Capital Gains Account Scheme is utilized for the construction or purchase of a new asset within the specified time, income tax is chargeable on the unutilized amount.
The Tyre Plaza Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that in the present case, the eligibility of the Petitioner to claim the input tax credit (ITC) has not been doubted by the Respondents. However, for no fault of the Petitioner, despite repeated attempts, it could […]
Sikka Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that in the present case, the eligibility of the Petitioner to claim ITC has not been doubted by the Respondents. However, for no fault of the Petitioner, despite filing the form GST […]
Manglesh Champaklal Gandhi Vs Aditya Birla Finance Ltd. (Gujarat High Court) It is clear that on reading the provisions of Section 13(4) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 with Rule 8 of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, the Court held that once possession notice is given under […]
CIT Vs M/s. Vaani Estates Pvt. Ltd. (Madras High Court) Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid provisions, we are of the opinion that the learned Assessing authority was required to undertake the exercise of fact finding by determining the Fair Market Value of the Shares in question as required […]
Section 45(4) would not be attracted on the retirement of the two partners and consequential allotment of their share in the assets in the assessee-firm as there was no element of transfer of interest in the partnership assets by the retiring partner to the continuing partners.
Jakap Metind Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) In this case, it is not as if the petitioner has not filed FORM GST TRAN-1 within the time provided by the respondents under the rules. The petitioner had filed the form, but on account of not properly understanding the nature of the columns […]
Smt. Krishana Kumari Devi Vs Harihar Chandra Bhanjdeo (Chhattisgarh High Court) It is, indisputably and fairly well settled that private was to remain with him under the covenant/agreement executed with the GOI and the said property has to pass on from one Ruler to another in terms of Article 5 of the agreement. It would […]
